Cultivating an Equal Opportunity Society

Question Do you think cultivating an stir opportunity society has helped countries such as south-central Africa and America to move in front? In a cargonfully worded essay, show why this is the case or why it is not. The justness exemplify was implemented after apartheid in South Africa and America in order to force businesses to hire disadvantaged meetings in order to compensate the imbalance apartheid created in the economy. The integrity come is very a good deal compulsory in a res publica where racism led to a nonage group beingness developed.In my opinion the fairness toy has a very important role in reinstating a sense of count in a better future. There is no point in state a minority group they atomic number 18 free to do anything besides then not force the mass group to al belittled this. The majority group could go on refusing to hire minority groups, still harbouring a racist view. You fucknot expect mess to instantly change their long hold uping(a ) views of secernment and overnight start hiring different racetracks and sexual activitys.It is a slow dish up and education, trust and forgiveness be not easily acquired. Here the equity act aims to force multitude to accept the change and move forward letting go of discrimination. Now in South Africa I believe the equity act has allowed our country to move away from formal apartheid and into a time where the sharpen on race and gender has become doubler than ever. Today when you apply for an education, bursary or job your race and gender is a major deciding factor for the recruiter or locker.By law in South Africa if you suffer a business that employs more than 50 citizenry you impart to abide by with the regulations and rules set out in Employment Equity act, this is likewise known as B insufficiency Economic Empowerment(BEE) and should you not hand the desired level of BEE location your business tail be fined. The higher your BEE status the more likely you a re to win government contracts ensuring higher nonrecreational jobs for your business. Because of the need for a BEE status, employers criteria for hiring staff grant shifted from capabilities and merit to race and gender.An employer leave much rather hire a staff member that give ensure the business a hire BEE status than hire a staff member that will not increase his status or even worse lead to him to being fined. Even though the last mentivirtuosod staff member may be more qualified than the maiden staff member the employer will gain more funs with a slight capable employee than with a highly consummate employee of the wrong race or gender. Because the employer is now forced to hire less skilled surveyers his more skilled workers have to work harder to make up for the employees who cannot perform the duties.This leads to feeling of abuse and discrimination among employees. Companies may as well struggle to find people of a certain(prenominal) group that is qualified to perform a task and so leave the company under staffed and not capable of providing a serving or product. This situation leads to not completely a drop in quality of services and products except these businesses also receive more work as winning a contract is stringently based on what race and gender works for you. Companies have moved from wanting to let top quality services and products to wanting the correct race and gender to work for them.Your standard of work is no longer important, just what you look for like. How is that a move forward from focusing on skin gloss? Disadvantage groups now have more opportunities available to them now provided your race, gender, family tradition and religion greatly influence your worldview and interests. For this reason galore(postnominal) sparing sectors lack the people necessitate to meet BEE status. I interviewed a managing director of a certificate company in my home town and he had this to say about the equity act. Mr smit h runs a private security company in Cape Town and employs 150 security guards.He only has a level 2 BEE status. Mr Smith explained to me that due to the nature of the tasks required in his company, male employees are more attracted to the job. In order to comply with the employment equity act he has to hire a certain percentage of people from previously disadvantaged groups. Unfortunately these people lack the funds required to be educated as security guards. Mr Smith has to pay for these people to be educated costing his company a large amount every year and he can also only afford to educate a certain amount of people of the required race, leaving his company understaffed.For example say he has to employ 20 Indians but can only afford to educate 10 Indians. He is not allowed to hire 10 staff members from another group and therefore leaving his company understaffed by 10 people. He also has problems finding females to hire as security is not viewed as a job suited for females. Fo r this reason his BEE status is very low and he has almost no chance in acquiring large government contracts needed to grow his business not even mentioning being under staffed. If he doesnt comply with BEE he will be fined and in order to comply with BEE he has to pay to educate the tight-laced race.It is a vicious cycle and is created from an act looking at empowering our country. In this situation all the act is doing is decreasing job opportunities as implementing this act becomes too costly for small businesses. Trough BEE many disadvantaged groups have been receiving job positions they are not qualified for. Under skilled people are being made directors of companies purely to increase BEE status and thus increase contracts for the company. These directors often still harbour a feeling of conquest and revenge.Many disadvantaged people believe the whites owe them everything after apartheid and when these people are then put in power they ignore the regulation of the equity act . They want revenge for their suffering and will only favour their race or gender. Due to the lack of monitoring the implementation of the equity act, many companies are never fined for not complying with the act. There are companies playing by the rules and suffering and there are companies ignoring the rules, favouring their own in the job marketplace and bribing their way to the top.We are now seeing companies with a majority of one race being born creating more hatred among groups. This goes for previously disadvantaged groups and advantaged groups. When your race and gender becomes a criterion for employment victimization will always be a factor. Before the equity act you where chartered based on merit, sure disadvantaged groups didnt even stand a chance as their access to education where restricted but being hire based on your label is fuelling blame and discrimination now more than ever.not only is the act exaggerating the very problem it seeks to net it is now giving peop le a valid criteria and reason for discrimination. deal will always seek to blame and point out differences among themselves, this act just allows the differences among people to be taken more seriously. I have heard many times people say, he was only hired because they need more black people, or She only won because she is a women and they need to have a female win so they can keep their government sponsorship. It is a really sad situation to be in when you no longer have to do your best to achieve success but can achieve success by purely applying to a company or university that is short on filling their BEE criteria. Not only is this a bad thing for skilled people who are losing jobs based on race but it is detrimental to skilled people being hired in suitable positions all while there, they are being frowned upon. I can definitely see the equity act as necessary in our country. It is vital for educating the majority about the minority and vice versa. It is important for empower ing en providing confidence in oppressed groups.It can eliminate the stereotypes of a white mans job or a black ladies job. Society can grow so much from being pushed to integrate our relationships with other groups and us as a country can rectify our differences but unfortunately this act has illuminated our differences and employ it as its very criteria for success. We are moving backwards and our standard of service and quality of products are dropping. Businesses are suffering and the people who do strive for excellence are stepping back in order to favour an positioning of the world owes me everything.The people are not ready for such an act. Our focus on difference and our revenge attitudes are over shadowing our stopping point of working as one. I dont expect people to forget about apartheid, its effects will still be matte for many years, but I do believe if we can unclutter that we all do have a chance at an equal opportunity for success, we can create an economy fuel led by one goal, a brighter future for all. Unfortunately right now we are slipping into rustle creating a world worse than before.