Business Ethics Challenge

There ar a few common types of reverse twaddle, which include get the degree for a short full term and travel it afterwards (wardrobing), sire spots in perverting conditions, returning stolen items and apply fake emolument to return items. Ashton might generate committed two types of return fraud, one organism wardrobing , which involves purchasing an item with the intention of using it once and returning it; the other(a) world returning the item in a bad condition. In this case, the items refer to the virgin suit and accessories for her school pro events.\nWe define an ethical bodily function as an act which defames detrimental impacts on other parties. Although actions under(a) return fraud  are not technically stealing, it is lighten a violation against the retail policies. However, before analyzing the ethical preserves of such an act, it is necessary to identify her reasons for doing so.\nFrom her vertex of view, the benefits of her actions are tw ofold: to minimize costs, monetary and non-monetary (e.g. time); as easy as to glide by up with trends. It is therefore understandable wherefore she decided to employ such a method. However, her actions may bid certain ethical cares and consequences to other parties, which will be discussed in our presentation. \nOur first ethical concern is that she returned the items at their pristine conditions. This, although being a more temperate type of return fraud , is the act of wardrobing . She didnt intend to keep the product the moment she bought it. This is an misdirect of the return policy. \nThe consequence that arises from this concern is the suffering of other consumers. afterwards receiving the items, the company will head start implementing stricter retail policies to prevent themselves from being deceived by consumers again. This may also affect other customers who move over legitimate reasons to return bracing products. For instance, policies like keeping the r eliable packaging, requiring receipt or ikon identification f...